Showing posts with label bridgeCantilever. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bridgeCantilever. Show all posts

NS/Sou/CNOTP/CS 1877+1911 Bridge over Kentucky River near High Bridge, KY

(Bridge Hunter, several construction photos; Historic Bridges, also has construction photos; HAERBridge & TunnelsSatellite, 71+ photos)

To explain the title, Cincinnati built and owns the Cincinnati Southern route, but it now leases it to the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Norfolk Southern (formally Southern).

John Hamilton posted
The deep truss allowed it to be built around the old truss. Note the engine under the traveler on the right to get a sense of scale.
Engineering Record, Vol. 62, 1910. Digitized By Google. from Historic Bridges

Share:

I-255+US-50 Jefferson Barracks Bridge over Mississippi River near St. Louis


I don't normally do yet another steel tied-arch bridge, but when you get a view as unique as this, I went for it. This is "reverse railfan." Specifically, it is a photo from a train instead of a train. And at the bottom is some photos of the cantilever truss that it replaced.

William A. Shaffer posted
The Jefferson Barracks Bridge at St. Louis, MO
(Shot through the window of Amtrak #22 en route to St. Louis)
(Photo by William A. Shaffer)
By Service Depicted: Other ServiceCamera Operator: SSGT PAUL GRIFFIN - ID:DFST9500065, Public Domain, Link
Roads and farmland in St. Louis area are hard hit by floodwaters. Location: SAINT LOUIS, ILLINOIS (IL) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (USA)
1993
Westbound bridge built 1984; eastbound bridge built 1990, The navigation channel span is 910'.
Missouri State Archives from Flickr
The eastbound span of the Jefferson Barracks (I-255) bridge was opened in December 1990, not 1986. It was opened right around the time that Iben Browning predicted that there would be a major earthquake on the New Madrid Fault. It took some time to complete the eastbound span, as there were money and construction issues. They also dropped one of the horizontal steel members from the arch into the Mississippi River while it was being hoisted, and some time was lost while they retrieved it. I remember that there was a lot of talk at the time about how that earthquake (if it happened) might affect the new bridge. I do have some pictures of the old bridge alongside the new one while it was being build back in the early and mid-80's. The old Jefferson Barracks bridge was completed in 1944 as a war-time measure to allow the Illinois side better access to the western part of the St. Louis area. At that time, there were no bridges on the Mississippi River between the Chester (IL) bridge and the MacArthur Bridge in St. Louis and only a ferry at Davis Street in south St. Louis that crossed over to East Carondelet in Illinois. There was also a railroad ferry that operated between the Carondelet section of south St. Louis and the railyard at Dupo, Illinois that I believe stopped operation sometime in the 1950's. The old Jefferson Barracks was a toll bridge until 1959, when the bonds were paid off. It closed for good when the new bridge opened in 1984 and was eventually demolished. I remember there was a proposal to dismantle it and ship it to South American to be rebuilt somewhere (I never did hear what country was involved)there, but that obviously never came about. [Bridge Hunter comment by Al Bertram]
Some photos of the previous bridge from the Bridge Hunter comments.

1

2

3



Share:

UP/SP/Texas & New Orleans Pecos River High Bridges near Langtry, TX

(1892 Bridge Hunter, 1944 Bridge Hunter, HAERSatellite)

The Pecos River gorge has been the location of two of the world's highest bridges: the 1892 Pecos Viaduct and the current structure, its 1944 successor. Increased traffic during World War II necessitated the replacement of this critical link on a major east-west railroad. Though built
under material and labor constraints caused by the war, this 1390'-6"-long continuous steel cantilever truss' austere design is nonetheless in harmony with its remote desert setting. The Pecos River High Bridge is also significant for technical achievements, such as its 275'-high slip-formed concrete piers.
  [HAER data, p1]

Mark Fuller posted
This is one of my favorite. Don’t look down!
Lang Thompson Says. Pecos High Bridge Ht 321 Ft, L 2100 Ft, The old bridge over the Pecos River near Langtry, Texas.
Peter Metrinko This is a fascinating bridge. I found a complete history of it.https://www.nps.gov/amis/learn/historyculture/viaduct.htmStrengthened, it was in use through WWII! The page also has construction photos, and a mystery - are parts of the bridge still in use on other bridges? Thanks, Mark Fuller.
Oh, another page shows you the replacement bridge. There's a picnic site - so if anyone wants to go to Langtry TX.http://www.texasescapes.com/.../Langtry_scenic_overlook.htm

Jeff Baumann Looks like a 5mph wind would just blow it right over! Not enough cross beams for my liking! I'm amazed it's supporting that train.
The record breaking 320'-10 3/4" high 1892 bridge replaced a low bridge built a decade earlier that required 11 torturous miles of track to descend down to river level. [HAER data, p3]

"The second Pecos River High Bridge's structural form allowed it to support greater loads
than its predecessor while using a comparable amount of metal." But it used steel instead of iron. " While a pier ideally would taper uniformly from top to bottom, it would require a great
deal of form work, especially over the 275'-4 1/2" of the Pecos River bridge's tallest pier (pier
C). Modjeski and Masters instead chose slip-forming, a method whereby a short form is moved
upward for another concrete pour when the previous pour reaches sufficient strength. Slipforming required the Pecos River bridge's piers to have "vertical sides, narrowed in occasional
steps."
20 The piers are hollow octagonal shells, to reduce the amount of concrete and speed
curing. In the sloped transition piece at the junction between each shell and the narrower one
above, steel reinforcement is like that found in a reinforced concrete dome.
" [HAER data, pp5-6]

Photo from HAER TX,233-LANG.V,1--9 (CT) from tx0894
1892 Phoenix Bridge 37 photographs showing the construction sequence

The photos confirm that the travelling derrick built half the center span, and then they moved the derrick and built from the other direction.

Photo 30
Photo 37
Electrical West, Vol. 14, p56
[This article claims the 1892 structure contained steel.]
Railway Times, Vol. 87, p403
[This article confirms the concrete piers are high because during a flood the river can rise 20' to 30' in just 24 hours.]


Share:

Quebec Bridge over St. Lawrence River

(Historic Bridges)
3D Satellite
It is a cantilever bridge with a suspended span. As is typical now, the suspended span for the 1916 design was built on shore, floated out into position, and then jacked up into position. Unfortunately, in 1907 the south tower collapsed during construction. In 1916, the suspension span fell while being hoisted into position. In 1917 they successfully completed the bridge.
Popular Mechanics, Dec. 1917, Public Domain
[The following information, unless otherwise noted, is from TheCanadianEncyclopedia (TCE)]

In 1907 it would be the largest structure of its kind and the longest bridge in the world, outstripping the famous Firth of Forth Bridge in Scotland. It carried trains, cars, and pedestrians. (It is still the longest cantilever bridge. [Wikipedia])

The spans of the 1907 design by Theodore Cooper were increased from 490m to 550m to reduce the construction cost of the piers. A Canadian government engineer reviewed the design and criticized the very high stresses caused by the longer spans. But Cooper blew him off. And Cooper refused to supervise the construction on site.
A young engineer by the name of Norman McLure was the first to see the problem. On August 6 McLure reported to Cooper that the lower chords on the south arm were bent. Cooper wired back almost plaintively "How did that happen?" McLure reported two more bent chords on August 12 but Chief Engineer John Deans insisted that work continue. On August 27 McLure measured the bend again. The deflection had grown. He informed Cooper who wired the bridge company in Pennsylvania: "Place no more load on Quebec bridge until all facts considered." Cooper assumed that the work had stopped. Deans had read his wire but ignored it.
The bridge collapsed on Aug 29, 1907 killing 75 of the 86 workers.  "A group of sightseers looked back in horror when they heard the sound, for they had only left the bridge minutes before."

TCE

TCE

The Royal Commission of Inquiry investigating the calamity excoriated John Deans for his poor judgment in allowing work to continue when it was obvious that the bridge was in danger. The brunt of the blame, however, was placed on the shoulders of Theodore Cooper, who had committed grave errors in design and his calculation of loads. There was criticism of the bridge company for putting profit above safety and for engineers who neglected their professional and moral duties.
It took two years just to clean up the mess. The Canadian government assumed control and rebuilt it with much heavier (and uglier) cantilever arms. On Sept. 11, 1916, 13 men were killed when the span fell while being hoisted into position. It was finally completed in 1917.

[The end of information from TCE]

To keep the bridge cheap, Cooper had already used unusually high allowable stresses in his initial design. And he did not recalculate the stresses when the span was lengthened! [ASCE]

McCord Museum
This image indicates that the first design built the suspended span in place.
Cleveland Statue University
[This is a much more technical article if you want more detail about the first design and its failure.]
The upper cords are in tension while the lower cords are in compression. Steel is strong in tension. It is a challenge to design truss members to handle compression. That is why it was the lower cords that first buckled.

In contrast to the 1907 failure, the only info I can find on the 1916 failure is "a problem with the hoisting devices." [Wikipedia]
By historical archive, Link, cropped
These two Facebook videos were my motivation for writing this post: moving the suspension span and 1928 usage and maintenance of the bridge.

Historic Bridges says that we can look forward to a third collapse because the Canadian National Railroad considers painting to be an aesthetic consideration rather than needed maintenance! ("
demolition by neglect" ) Evidently they have allowed the rust to get rather thick. Now there is the expense of removing the rust before it can be painted. Government entities have even offered to pay half of the cost, but CN still refuses to maintain the bridge.




Share:

CN/WC Arcola High Bridges over St. Croix River

(Bridge Hunter (has several construction photos below John's photos), Historic Bridges, John Weeks IIISatellite)

John Weeks III
Technically this is not an arch bridge. Judging from this construction photo, it is a cantilever bridge. But I also labeled it as an arch bridge to make it easier to find.

Photo from Bridge Hunter, Public Domain: Published Prior to 1923
Jordan Palmer posted two photos with the comment:
Wisconsin Central Bridge at Arcola, Minnesota then and now. Built in 1884 by Union Bridge and Iron Works it was part of WCs route from Chippewa Falls to St. Paul. The original bridge was removed on February 28 1916 following replacement with the Arcola Highbridge completed in 1909. First photo is from Minnesota Historical Society, second one is mine from several years ago.
1

2

Harvey Henkelmann commented on Jordan's posting
And here is it's famous replacement
Digitized by Google
Jordan Palmer posted two photos with the comment:
Couple more shots of my favorite bridge, the Arcola High Bridge, aka the Soo Line or Wisconsin Central Higbridge. The bridge stands roughly 185 feet above the St Croix River below at normal water level, and has five arches each roughly 300' long, plus approach trestles on each side stretching the bridge to nearly 1/2mile total length. The first photo is from a river trip nine or ten years ago now, and the second is from September of last year when I was finally able to catch a train rumbling across it. The Arcola High Bridge is now nearly 110 years old, and replaced the original Arcola crossing just down river 3/4mile that was built in the 1880s removing the long steep grades on both sides of the river as the original bridge was only about 70' above the river.
1

2
Jordan Palmer commented on his posting
One of my winter shots from few years ago.

Jordan Palmer commented on his posting
And a shot from bout 1/2 mile or so south bout five years ago.
A better exposure of the construction photo:
Digitized by Google


Share:

CSX/C&O+HV 1917 Bridge over Ohio River at Sciotoville in Portsmouth, OH

(Bridge Hunter, Historic Bridges, Satellite)

Historic Bridges
Stu Levene photo:
The seldom-photographed Sciotoville (Limeville) Bridge towers above a CSX train of 129 empty coal hoppers. The shot was taken from on top of the parapet at the south side of the bridge.
Appalachian Railfan photo:
A coal train makes it way westbound (TT Direction) with coal destined for points north as the final light of day is setting over the Ohio River. A scene like this only makes me reflect on a time when it was possible to see C&O Superpower haul miles of black diamonds along this route. What a sight that would have been to see.
"This bridge held the record for longest continuous truss span [775'] in the world from its opening until 1945. See April 2000 Trains Magazine for an article on this bridge." [Bridge Hunter] It was also the heaviest. [Historic Bridges] "It remains today the mightiest bridge ever built from the point of view of its load capacity." [cohs]

McClintic-Marshall Company booklet from Historic Bridges

Gary Bellamy commented on a posting
Ken L. Chamblin commented on a posting
Here is a view from the Ky side taken by me from my train 

Ken L. Chamblin commented on a posting
Got Tunnel Vision?

Engineering News-Record Vol. 80, No. 2, p62 from Historic Bridges
One side was built on falsework. Then the cantilever design allowed the other side to be built with minimal falsework because the first side was available to balance it. But the forces on the joints changed between the initial truss structure on the first side and the final cantilevered truss so hydraulic jacks were needed to join some of the members for riveting. The following catches the center pier completed, wooden piers used as falsework, a travelling gantry on the false work to build the supported span, and a creeper hoist on the other side of the center pier to build the suspended span.

Engineering News-Record, Jan 31, 1918, p221 from Historic Bridges
"It contains some of the most massive members and chords ever seen in a truss bridge." [Historic Bridges] The following shows a member that requires both booms of the hoisting tower to lift it.

Engineering News-Record Vol. 80, No. 2, p66 from Historic Bridges
A pictorial summary of the construction stages. As the suspended span grew, they could remove some of the false work under the supported span because it was being held up by the weight of the suspended span. Reducing the number of falsework piers in the river was important in the Winter to reduce the impact of ice flows on the falsework.

Engineering News-Record, Jan 31, 1918, p235 from Historic Bridges
One of three photos posted by Charles E. Whisnant


The massive size of the members is caught by this photo. I had to look a while before I did find some men in the photo.

Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. LXXXV, 1922, p931 from Historic Bridges
Three photos by Dave Honan with the comment:
A couple miles east of Portsmouth, OH, is CSX's massive Sciotoville Bridge, a two-span, 1,550-foot continuous truss bridge over the Ohio River. The structure, the heaviest continuous truss bridge on the continent, was designed by David Steinman and built by Gustav Lindenthal between 1914-17 for the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway. (April 05, 2004)
1

2
3

Share:

NS/CNOTP/Sou/CS 1965 Bridge over New River

(Bridge Hunter, Historic BridgesSatellite)

To explain the title, Cincinnati built and owns the Cincinnati Southern route, but it now leases it to the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Norfolk Southern.

Unknown company photographer from Bridge Hunter
Everett Posey posted a drone video
NEW RIVER TENNESSEE RAILROAD BRIDGE
At the time of construction in 1965 this railroad bridge was one of the tallest at 350 ft. East of the Mississippi.

Jeff England shared
Nathanmark PurvisNathanmark and 778 others joined RAILROAD BRIDGES, TRESTLES, TUNNELS AND CUTS within the last two weeks. Give them a warm welcome into your community! too bad the owners are so cheap they don't bother to keep any paint on these structures anymore.Jim Polston ecology considerations make it expensive to paint--reason BNSF stopped painting!JoePat ChaistyJoePat and 778 others joined RAILROAD BRIDGES, TRESTLES, TUNNELS AND CUTS within the last two weeks. Give them a warm welcome into your community! beleive it or not surface rust best protection for steel in open, structure rust only problem around rivet holes, when drilled on site,rolls royce engine,s left out in weather for years before being machined for cars ,paint greatest rust builder that why constant maintenence needed joe aust
Dennis DeBruler commented on JoePat's comment
Rust can be a problem in the open as well. These rust holes in the side girder are in a former Rock Island overpass in Joliet, IL. The tracks had been removed a long time ago. I heard the issue is that before they paint, they would have to remove the old paint. But the old paint contains lead. I wonder if lead paint is also why they haven't scrapped it. Surely it doesn't have asbestos.

Jeff EnglandJeff and 776 others joined RAILROAD BRIDGES, TRESTLES, TUNNELS AND CUTS within the last two weeks. Give them a warm welcome into your community! Really? No asbestos. Lead paint more than likely.Dennis DeBruler As someone pointed out to me, the railroads "fix" the lead paint problem by letting it wear off into the environment. A case in point where an environmental regulation has the exact opposite affect than what was intended by the person who wrote the regulation.
Norfolk Southern Corp posted
Norfolk Southern serves shippers and receivers of many agricultural products, including corn, wheat, soybeans, miscellaneous grains, animal and poultry feed, sweeteners, ethanol, food oils, flour, beverages, canned goods, and consumer products. Learn more about NS shipping options: http://bit.ly/1KMfSOc
Pictured: train 55E crosses the New River Bridge in Tennessee.

Charles Lawrence Is this the tail of the train since there is just one engine?Jordan Campbell I was wondering the same.


(new window)  It is looking rather rusty.


The New River Railroad Bridge is the tallest railroad bridge in the State of Tennessee, at 389 feet above the New River Gorge. The river channel cantilever span stands on two hollow piers, 392 feet apart. The bridge was built along a realignment of Cincinnati Southern's infamous "Rathole" Line, between Danville, Kentucky and Oakdale, Tennessee, to reduce the number of tunnels and fault line crossings on the Cincinnati-to-Chattanooga route. The realignment also lowered the steep incline into the New River Valley northward from Elgin, Tennessee, eliminating the need for the Robbins Tunnel and the old New River crossing. [Bridge Hunter]
I noticed there are several more You Tube videos of this bridge.

A Bridge Hunter comment by Alex Wood: "I was out at the bridge in August and met some construction workers. They were resurfacing the pillars, taking 8 inches of concrete off the pillars and resurfacing. Ironically, the engineer I met said its one of the worst built structures he has worked on in a 30+ year career."

Share:

Featured Post

Copper River & Northwestern Railway and its bridges

Mile 27, Flag Point Bridge: ( Satellite ; Blog ; more below) Mile 28: the bridge no longer exists; Blog Mile 34, Hot Cake Bridge: the bridge...